Search found 103 matches
- Mon Oct 13, 2003 3:22 am
- Forum: IRC Clients
- Topic: New bug in mIRC (post 6.0)
- Replies: 12
- Views: 18782
- Sun Oct 12, 2003 5:42 pm
- Forum: IRCD
- Topic: mesh networks / iOSPF
- Replies: 5
- Views: 32678
Re: mesh networks / iOSPF
There's been some chat lately about adding features to IRCD code to allow for multiple server links, creating a mesh type network map. does the current hybrid not support this already? (i take it by your post it seems no and this might be a stupid question.) what currently would stop from someone d...
- Sat Oct 11, 2003 8:43 pm
- Forum: IRCD
- Topic: in the future will opers need to have more control?
- Replies: 59
- Views: 179251
because the hosts some people choose on other networks are EXTREMELY annoying. Yes, I know that people still create incredibly annoying real, valid hosts, but they would be so much more prevalent if all users could choose their own. one problem i have with user spoofing is that it redirects DoS to ...
- Fri Oct 10, 2003 6:54 pm
- Forum: IRCD
- Topic: in the future will opers need to have more control?
- Replies: 59
- Views: 179251
- Fri Oct 10, 2003 5:13 pm
- Forum: IRCD
- Topic: in the future will opers need to have more control?
- Replies: 59
- Views: 179251
- Fri Oct 10, 2003 2:22 pm
- Forum: IRCD
- Topic: in the future will opers need to have more control?
- Replies: 59
- Views: 179251
yes that is true. but the thing is we can never totally abolish everything but we can help prevent things. for example bopm will help reduce proxy floods but sometimes it wont totally stop them. it also helps the user's mentality. some users just feel more secure if they have a spoofed adress. yes i...
- Fri Oct 10, 2003 9:47 am
- Forum: IRCD
- Topic: in the future will opers need to have more control?
- Replies: 59
- Views: 179251
- Fri Oct 10, 2003 9:42 am
- Forum: IRCD
- Topic: in the future will opers need to have more control?
- Replies: 59
- Views: 179251
- Thu Oct 09, 2003 3:44 pm
- Forum: IRCD
- Topic: in the future will opers need to have more control?
- Replies: 59
- Views: 179251
- Thu Oct 09, 2003 9:24 am
- Forum: IRCD
- Topic: in the future will opers need to have more control?
- Replies: 59
- Views: 179251
so if these spoofs make people unbannable does unreal ircd servers and other spoofing servers suffer from this problem? also if they dont suffer how do they implement correctly? one idea is to create a hash for each network. it is randomly generated at install and the same hash is given to all serve...
- Sun Oct 05, 2003 7:07 pm
- Forum: IRCD
- Topic: in the future will opers need to have more control?
- Replies: 59
- Views: 179251
this is an idea that could be interesting, and i think might just work. have that ascii picture authentication but make it not required. if the client does not give the passphrase then it gets a special flag marked on it as a possible bot. the server then traces over the network to find similiar cli...
- Sun Sep 28, 2003 7:17 pm
- Forum: IRCD
- Topic: in the future will opers need to have more control?
- Replies: 59
- Views: 179251
- Wed Sep 24, 2003 11:49 am
- Forum: IRCD
- Topic: in the future will opers need to have more control?
- Replies: 59
- Views: 179251
- Thu Sep 18, 2003 10:27 pm
- Forum: IRCD
- Topic: tcm bot crashing
- Replies: 12
- Views: 47169
a lot of linux distros put the core file to zero for security reasons, sometimes daemons leave world readable core files with important info [irc@ns tcm]$ gdb bin/tcm ./core GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (5.2-2) Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General P...
- Thu Sep 18, 2003 5:19 pm
- Forum: IRCD
- Topic: tcm bot crashing
- Replies: 12
- Views: 47169
i just remembered that i did get errors during compiling, having to do with socket.h. gcc -I../include -g -O2 -Wall -c util.c In file included from /usr/include/sys/socket.h:35, from util.c:11: /usr/include/bits/socket.h:36: warning: empty declaration gcc -I../include -g -O2 -Wall -c actions.c In fi...