Search found 66 matches
- Sun Nov 30, 2003 9:33 pm
- Forum: IRCD
- Topic: core in ratbox 1.3rc3
- Replies: 4
- Views: 31373
ulimit -c unlimited Running that command (provided it's a system with a bourne shell derivative) will allow cores to be dumped. Then you can get the proper information. I can't duplicate this core on my mixed testnet, using both temp and permanent remote klines. I don't understand this core either.....
- Mon Nov 24, 2003 1:12 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: EFnet foundation
- Replies: 18
- Views: 33304
- Thu Nov 20, 2003 9:56 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Do we need more ipv6 servers?
- Replies: 57
- Views: 88795
- Thu Nov 20, 2003 9:48 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: EFnet foundation
- Replies: 18
- Views: 33304
So no one knows the exact date then? hehe, very odd... On a different note... This has struck me before, that admins must have seriously disliked eris to create a network purly dedicated to be free of it, I find that very odd... especially for (these days) such a widly known network. eris had an op...
It's still a draft and not yet complete. ircd-ratbox current (2.x) and Hybrid 7-current (7.1 or 8.x) implement it (at least partially) but it's not been heavily tested. It's been said (though I don't know if it's official) that there will be no TS6 support added to hybrid 6.x, or to the stable versi...
- Sun Nov 09, 2003 1:08 am
- Forum: Help
- Topic: Banned because of Clones
- Replies: 7
- Views: 9059
TCM's and OOmon's often communicate with SERVICES (/msg SERVICES@services.xo help) and will ban user@host clones on multiple servers (The default is to allow up to 3, banning 4 or over). It may be a good idea to limit the number of bots runnable under one account, and disallow sharing of BNC connect...
- Sun Nov 02, 2003 5:14 pm
- Forum: IRCD
- Topic: problem linking ratbox locally
- Replies: 6
- Views: 35483
- Wed Oct 22, 2003 11:49 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Verio links a second server named irc.jealousy.com
- Replies: 9
- Views: 14335
just out of curiosity, do you want server admins to have root on the that an efnet irc server runs from? also do they need to be an isp and what type of FD limit do these boxes have? if a server can support 9000 clients that must be an insane fd limit. Whatever number of clients you allow, you must...
- Mon Oct 20, 2003 7:21 pm
- Forum: IRCD
- Topic: hybrid 6.4.1 remote kline/unkline patch
- Replies: 4
- Views: 31130
- Fri Oct 17, 2003 8:45 pm
- Forum: IRCD
- Topic: hybrid 6.4.1 remote kline/unkline patch
- Replies: 4
- Views: 31130
- Thu Oct 16, 2003 12:34 am
- Forum: IRCD
- Topic: csircd not compliant
- Replies: 5
- Views: 34717
nac's hub is not csircd, it's a modified Hybrid 6: 20h 12 :: *** 2.8/hybrid-6.3.1(20020418_1). ircd.nac.net ACGHiKMpZ TS5owc 20h 12 :: *** SUPPORTLAMERS=0 GOAWAYBITCH=all are supported by this server The 005 is a joke message, so looking into the VERSION flags: It doesn't support setting +e locally ...
- Mon Oct 13, 2003 9:27 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Linking with Latvia
- Replies: 2
- Views: 8710
You will have to fulfill all of the requirements listed on http://www.eu-efnet.net/ . If you have everything listed, then you can follow the instructions in that file. Since there is no e-mail address in the file telling you where to submit it, you will have to talk to a current administrator of a E...
- Sat Sep 27, 2003 1:28 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: How do people feel about OPME on EFnet ?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 71827
- Tue Sep 23, 2003 11:19 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: What about +d?
- Replies: 34
- Views: 52367
edit: oops, i was wrong, +d is a gecos ban. ok, retract all previous arguements about banning users on a specific server You're not totally wrong, a few years ago, there was a proposal to extend +d to block users from a specific server (mainly due to the issues (former, over 2 years ago) of spam an...
- Tue Sep 23, 2003 12:05 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: What about +d?
- Replies: 34
- Views: 52367
I'm not sure if your post was sarcastic/trolling or not, so forgive me if it was. Doesn't Chanfix join through channel modes/bans or unset modes/bans before it enters? Isn't that how it works when a chanfix/reverse gets done on a taken channel that has been set +i? It would then undo a +d chanmode ...