ulimit -c unlimited Running that command (provided it's a system with a bourne shell derivative) will allow cores to be dumped. Then you can get the proper information. I can't duplicate this core on my mixed testnet, using both temp and permanent remote klines. I don't understand this core either.....

Jepp wrote:that actaully seems like a good idea. i wonder why nobody liked it :?

It is a good idea if all people were respectful and didn't abuse. People will, unfortunately, be people, and mass kills, nick collides, SQUIT wars, and the like WILL be done no matter what.

EFnet simply doesn't have a lot of Asian users (primarily .jp). Some of those countries and ISP's already use native IPv6 extensively due to the lack of IPv4 addresses available.

So no one knows the exact date then? hehe, very odd... On a different note... This has struck me before, that admins must have seriously disliked eris to create a network purly dedicated to be free of it, I find that very odd... especially for (these days) such a widly known network. eris had an op...

It's still a draft and not yet complete. ircd-ratbox current (2.x) and Hybrid 7-current (7.1 or 8.x) implement it (at least partially) but it's not been heavily tested. It's been said (though I don't know if it's official) that there will be no TS6 support added to hybrid 6.x, or to the stable versi...

TCM's and OOmon's often communicate with SERVICES (/msg SERVICES@services.xo help) and will ban user@host clones on multiple servers (The default is to allow up to 3, banning 4 or over). It may be a good idea to limit the number of bots runnable under one account, and disallow sharing of BNC connect...

Why are you using "fakename" here?

fakename is only meant to be used for masking servers (IE how concentric used to be *.concentric.net and lagged used to be *.lagged.org)

just out of curiosity, do you want server admins to have root on the that an efnet irc server runs from? also do they need to be an isp and what type of FD limit do these boxes have? if a server can support 9000 clients that must be an insane fd limit. Whatever number of clients you allow, you must...

modules/m_kline.c in both 7.0 and 7.1(CURRENT).

I looked through the ~200 patches in my archive, and see nothing that allows users on a h6.x server to set or accept the current standard of remote KLINE's. All I have is a patch for 6.3.1 to pass KLINE/UNKLINE between servers (and that is now part of 6.4 and higher)

nac's hub is not csircd, it's a modified Hybrid 6: 20h 12 :: *** 2.8/hybrid-6.3.1(20020418_1). ircd.nac.net ACGHiKMpZ TS5owc 20h 12 :: *** SUPPORTLAMERS=0 GOAWAYBITCH=all are supported by this server The 005 is a joke message, so looking into the VERSION flags: It doesn't support setting +e locally ...

You will have to fulfill all of the requirements listed on http://www.eu-efnet.net/ . If you have everything listed, then you can follow the instructions in that file. Since there is no e-mail address in the file telling you where to submit it, you will have to talk to a current administrator of a E...

prefect wrote: /stats p
/msg active oper
problem solved

Provided the server doesn't run patches that allow opers to fake their idle time.

edit: oops, i was wrong, +d is a gecos ban. ok, retract all previous arguements about banning users on a specific server You're not totally wrong, a few years ago, there was a proposal to extend +d to block users from a specific server (mainly due to the issues (former, over 2 years ago) of spam an...

I'm not sure if your post was sarcastic/trolling or not, so forgive me if it was. Doesn't Chanfix join through channel modes/bans or unset modes/bans before it enters? Isn't that how it works when a chanfix/reverse gets done on a taken channel that has been set +i? It would then undo a +d chanmode ...