HI EVERYBODY.
I want you to love me again plz.
Welcome to the new www.efnet.info forum :)
Moderators: Website/Forum Admins, EFnet/General Moderators
on a related note, is there a board setting to not show avatars? (other than setting my web browser to not show images, which i`ve been doing when i browse this forum) ... netmunky's avatar is not one that is good for me to have on my screen at work.Hardy wrote:For the record, i hate your signature and will try to find a way to block pictures in signatures
no, there's not, unfortunately. this has already been discussed among admins earlier. to disable images in .sigs, we would have to disable bbcode altogether.
other than that, it's either edit the code of phpbb, or make it a forum rule and hand edit people's profiles that put images in their .sig
other than that, it's either edit the code of phpbb, or make it a forum rule and hand edit people's profiles that put images in their .sig
In God we trust,
Everyone else must have an X.509 certificate.
Everyone else must have an X.509 certificate.
I dont see the necessity to ban image sigs.....although I took mine out yester day cause I couldnt get it to line up very good with the text.munky wrote:no, there's not, unfortunately. this has already been discussed among admins earlier. to disable images in .sigs, we would have to disable bbcode altogether.
other than that, it's either edit the code of phpbb, or make it a forum rule and hand edit people's profiles that put images in their .sig
because i hate trying to read forums that turn into something like (random google forum)EFNeT SuXoR wrote: I dont see the necessity to ban image sigs.....although I took mine out yester day cause I couldnt get it to line up very good with the text.
you have an avatar to put your image in, there's no need for 400x200 pixil images in your .sig. it seems absurd to have threads where 50-90% of the thread is .sig images.[/url]
In God we trust,
Everyone else must have an X.509 certificate.
Everyone else must have an X.509 certificate.
we can allow/disallow signatures, and we can limit signature length (in characters). beyond that, any limitations are on all posts (allow/disallow bbcode, html, etc).
image uploading (other than avatars) isn't allowed, so all images are inline. this means we have no means of setting a limitation on the size of the image.
image uploading (other than avatars) isn't allowed, so all images are inline. this means we have no means of setting a limitation on the size of the image.
In God we trust,
Everyone else must have an X.509 certificate.
Everyone else must have an X.509 certificate.
Well since the problem is height rather than width.........people should have a decency to limit height to 50-60 which is half| tad over half of what the one in this thread is, so there not a mile long thread.munky wrote:we can allow/disallow signatures, and we can limit signature length (in characters). beyond that, any limitations are on all posts (allow/disallow bbcode, html, etc).
image uploading (other than avatars) isn't allowed, so all images are inline. this means we have no means of setting a limitation on the size of the image.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests