Page 4 of 4
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 9:31 pm
by nexxai
HI EVERYBODY.
I want you to love me again plz.
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 10:10 pm
by Hardy
nexxai wrote:HI EVERYBODY.
I want you to love me again plz.
For the record, i hate your signature and will try to find a way to block pictures in signatures
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2003 7:07 pm
by wundr
Hardy wrote:For the record, i hate your signature and will try to find a way to block pictures in signatures
on a related note, is there a board setting to not show avatars? (other than setting my web browser to not show images, which i`ve been doing when i browse this forum) ... netmunky's avatar is not one that is good for me to have on my screen at work.
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2003 7:15 pm
by munky
no, there's not, unfortunately. this has already been discussed among admins earlier. to disable images in .sigs, we would have to disable bbcode altogether.
other than that, it's either edit the code of phpbb, or make it a forum rule and hand edit people's profiles that put images in their .sig
Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2003 4:09 am
by Guest
munky wrote:no, there's not, unfortunately. this has already been discussed among admins earlier. to disable images in .sigs, we would have to disable bbcode altogether.
other than that, it's either edit the code of phpbb, or make it a forum rule and hand edit people's profiles that put images in their .sig
I dont see the necessity to ban image sigs.....although I took mine out yester day cause I couldnt get it to line up very good with the text.
Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2003 3:50 am
by HM2K
Hello, nice to see its back, ya see I go on holiday and come back and everything has changed, oh well. (miss me?)
Good work so far qurve, I hope to see some more features soon.
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2003 2:00 pm
by munky
EFNeT SuXoR wrote:
I dont see the necessity to ban image sigs.....although I took mine out yester day cause I couldnt get it to line up very good with the text.
because i hate trying to read forums that turn into something like
(random google forum)
you have an avatar to put your image in, there's no need for 400x200 pixil images in your .sig. it seems absurd to have threads where 50-90% of the thread is .sig images.[/url]
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2003 6:21 pm
by lucy
is there any way to limit how big they can be?
maybe a tiny little picture wouldn't be THAT bad.
but its pretty annoying seeing such big ones.
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2003 8:18 pm
by munky
we can allow/disallow signatures, and we can limit signature length (in characters). beyond that, any limitations are on all posts (allow/disallow bbcode, html, etc).
image uploading (other than avatars) isn't allowed, so all images are inline. this means we have no means of setting a limitation on the size of the image.
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2003 7:30 am
by Guest
munky wrote:we can allow/disallow signatures, and we can limit signature length (in characters). beyond that, any limitations are on all posts (allow/disallow bbcode, html, etc).
image uploading (other than avatars) isn't allowed, so all images are inline. this means we have no means of setting a limitation on the size of the image.
Well since the problem is height rather than width.........people should have a decency to limit height to 50-60 which is half| tad over half of what the one in this thread is, so there not a mile long thread.
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2003 1:49 pm
by munky
this thread seems to be going far off topic. i think we can consider it closed (and as the forum has been public for a couple weeks now, i think it's safe to say we've had our "welcome back"s)